Forget Dr. Copper

Dan September 25, 2020

0 Comments

Corona Del Mar, CA

Howdy Friend!

You've got to love all the stock market lingo that is passed for science these days.

The hypothesis is that copper (the commodity) is used widely in various sectors and is therefore a leading indicator.

For example, 65% of copper is used in electrical wiring, 25% industrial, and 10% transportation, etc.

That sounds well and good, but is that the truth?

Did someone go through the hard work and test that idea in a computer? Or is this just BS being peddled by lazy market "gurus" that trade by the seat of their pants?

On a Boss group call yesterday, I was talking with John H. He's trading four strategies and was pleasantly surprised to see a commodity-like index pop into his trading strategies.

In fact, using a single trading rule that acts as a hair-trigger stop loss resulted in him making more money while experiencing much lower declines in his account (drawdown).

But that commodity has nothing to do with copper.

But it is used VERY WIDELY.

Find out the EXACT rule in this quick case study >>

Then come back and make sure you sign up for a Boss demo later today so you too can start making the strategies of your dreams with the help of Ai.

You are invited to a Zoom webinar where we'll be building trading strategies from scratch with push-button ease.

When: Sep 23, 2020 01:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)

Topic: The Boss LIVE Demo Register in advance for this webinar:

https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_053k05VdQoSSB-emeEWo9g

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

Trade smart,

Dan "Prince of Proof" Murphy

Disclaimer: The results listed herein are based on hypothetical trades. Plainly speaking, these trades were not actually executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under (or over) compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as lack of liquidity. You may have done better or worse than the results portrayed.

Categories: Portfolio Boss News

Related Articles

Shark Tank For The Mind

Corona Del Mar, CAHowdy Friend! Sharks…The ultimate killing machine. They’ve been biting into their victims for 420 million years…that’s even longer than trees have existed.Movies…

Dan April 22, 2020

0 Comments

The Pseudoscience of Charting

Corona Del Mar, CA Howdy Friend! Check out this chart…I drew some trend lines on it:See look! There are clearly trends in prices, and all you have…

Dan April 18, 2022

0 Comments

“You are full of s**t, a snake oil salesman” and other fun comments

Corona Del Mar, CA Howdy Friend! Awww The Internet.The good thing about the Internet is that you’re connected to everyone around the globe 24/7.The bad thing about…

Dan September 10, 2020

0 Comments

Sunday Funday Smart Money Update

Corona Del Mar, CAHowdy Friend!Many, many years ago when I was trading OEX options, I would call a 900 number to get updates from a…

Dan September 22, 2020

0 Comments

4 Trading Lessons from Crushing it at Monopoly

Corona Del Mar, CAHowdy Friend! Here’s how to beat the board game, Monopoly… And if I can teach an eight year old how to ace Monopoly in four lessons…

Dan June 10, 2021

0 Comments

Responses

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2025 Copyright All Rights Reserved. Portfolio Boss, Inc. | Powered By: Monster Development

*Earnings Disclaimer - Click to read*

EARNINGS DISCLAIMER: I like to provide full transparency and not blow smoke up your behind, so listen up.100% Club members in general are seeing between 91%-100% winning months in back tests just using the Instant Start templates I created for them. These results are out-of-sample (unseen in the optimization phase), so I put a lot of weight into that fact.

I don’t yet have a statistic for the average member as far as gains are concerned. There are a lot of variables because this is not a cookie-cutter program. I do have dozens of brokerage statements on file, and the majority are looking positive.

There were a couple outliers that weren’t good because they went off track. I believe I convinced them of where they went wrong and they are back on track (too much leverage, and some over-fitting to the past). That’s my job :)

There are other factors in play as well such as: Are you actually making the trades? Account size. Is your broker any good or are they fleecing you? Are you using all the leverage available to you, or are you dialing it back like I recommend?

Simply put, I believe the reason we’re seeing the highest preliminary success rate of any program EVER is because:

a) you’re selecting from 100+ supercomputer-built strategies, and the odds of them all failing at once are extremely low.

b) the strategies take advantage of highly unusual edges that very few if any know about.

c) Our Meta ML technology is completely unique in the trading world. Very few understand that all strategies have cycles, and that there are opportune times to trade them. This allows you to treat trading more like a business rather than a hobby.

d) The daily instructions are brain-dead simple to follow, and can be accomplished in just a few minutes.

Government required disclaimer: The results listed herein are based on hypothetical trades. Plainly speaking, these trades were not actually executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under (or over) compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as lack of liquidity. You may have done better or worse than the results portrayed.